CO129-262 - Governor Sir Robinson Acting Governor O-Brien - 1894 [1-4] — Page 573

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

fund, as given

are

Ord. no

the same.

in Schedule

1890,

30

as those

of the Straits Settlement Fund, and in view of the interpretation of the point in question given by M. Zilaisen,

I have the honour to inform you that I no longer think the amendment of the Ordinance suggested in my despatch, no. 195 of 7th Dec. 1893 is required.

Since the statement in the Enc. to that despatch from the officer transferred from this Colony to another, regarding the acquiring of an interest in the Fund, "which is not less than if he 'had contributed that amount during his whole service'", is now shown to have been incorrect and based upon a wrong interpretation of the rules.

3. I take this opportunity of pointing out that in the Schedule B to Ord. 30 of 1890, there are mistakes. [These mistakes arose from copying verbatim from the Ceylon scheme without duly altering the number of pars. thereof.] I suggest that the numerical references in certain articles to the "Illustrations of the Methods of Computing the pensions" are incorrect. viz. in Art. 2, the reference to "which Article 9" occurs four times, should read "Article 1"; in Art. 3, the words "Articles 9" ...

Edit History

2026-05-27 10:33:50 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
fund, as given are Ord. no the same. in Schedule 1890, 30 as those of the Straits Settlement Fund, and in view of the interpretation of the point in question given by M. Zilaisen, I have the honour to inform you that I no longer think the amendment of the Ordinance suggested in my despatch, no. 195 of 7th Dec. 1893 is required. Since the statement in the Enc. to that despatch from the officer transferred from this Colony to another, regarding the acquiring of an interest in the Fund, "which is not less than if he 'had contributed that amount during his whole service'", is now shown to have been incorrect and based upon a wrong interpretation of the rules. 3. I take this opportunity of pointing out that in the Schedule B to Ord. 30 of 1890, there are mistakes. [These mistakes arose from copying verbatim from the Ceylon scheme without duly altering the number of pars. thereof.] I suggest that the numerical references in certain articles to the "Illustrations of the Methods of Computing the pensions" are incorrect. viz. in Art. 2, the reference to "which Article 9" occurs four times, should read "Article 1"; in Art. 3, the words "Articles 9" ...
Baseline (Original)
fund, as given Воз are Ord. no the same. in Schedule 1890, 30 as those of the Straits Settlement Fund, and in view of the interpretation of the pornit in question given by M. Zilaisen, کا I have the Jeans & inform gen that I ne longer think the amendment of Ber Ordinance suggested in my desk, no. 195 of 7th Dec. 1893 is required, Since the statement inne the Enc. & that desp? from officer transferred Colony another acquiring interest in the Fund, "which is for consen not less than if he " had contributed that "duringhs whole 568 "service", is now shown to have been incorrect based upon a urong interpretation of the rules. 3. Itake this opportunit, of pointing out that in the Schedule B 30 of folla thin brd. 7. 1 1890, there [These mistakes sirdents arose from copying verbation this Ceylm scheme, without but altering the numben of pars. Thereof I Sug occur wal numerical the references errovia Ccertion articles the "Illustrations of the the Methods of Eucessing riz. the pensions: The eir Art. 2, the refer words " which "Article 9 occur four times, shoul "Article 1";" in read Art. 3 the words "Articles 9
2026-05-27 10:33:50 · Baseline
View content

fund, as given

Воз

are

Ord. no

the same.

in Schedule

1890,

30

as those

of the Straits Settlement Fund, and in view of the interpretation of the pornit in question given by M. Zilaisen,

کا

I have the Jeans &

inform gen

that I ne

longer think the

amendment of

Ber

Ordinance suggested

in my desk, no. 195 of 7th Dec. 1893 is required,

Since the statement inne the Enc. & that desp?

from

officer transferred Colony

another

acquiring

interest

in the Fund, "which is

for consen

not less than if he " had contributed that

"duringhs whole 568

"service",

is now shown

to have been incorrect

based upon a urong interpretation of the

rules.

3. Itake this opportunit,

of pointing out that

in the Schedule B

30 of

folla thin brd. 7. 1 1890, there

[These mistakes sirdents

arose from copying verbation this

Ceylm scheme,

without but

altering the numben of pars. Thereof I

Sug

occur

wal numerical

the references errovia Ccertion articles

the "Illustrations of the

the Methods of Eucessing

riz.

the pensions: The

eir

Art. 2, the refer words

" which "Article 9

occur four times, shoul

"Article 1";" in

read

Art. 3 the words "Articles

9

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.